IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,865 results that match your search.25,865 results
  • Veena Sivaramakrishnan Pooja Yedukumar Restructuring continues to be the buzz word in India in 2013. It is not just in the context of non-performing assets that banks and financial institutions are seeking to restructure their books. Be it corporate debt restructuring (CDR) or restructuring under the statutory realm of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), companies seem to be resorting to these methods as an easy means of rehabilitation. The CDR mechanism is technically voluntary, though most Indian banks (especially in the public sector) are members of the CDR Cell, thereby making it mandatory for them to participate in the restructuring of a company to which they have an exposure in India. The CDR process provides for banks and financial institutions (which are not a party to the Cell) to enforce their rights outside the CDR mechanism. Effectively this allows companies to get some leeway especially from CDR participating banks in relation to their obligations, while continuing to ensure that the rights of the non-participating banks are not adversely affected.
  • In 2008, the government of the Macau Special Administrative Region (MSAR) started the revision of the Land Law (Law 6/80/M) after concluding: "Given the demands of various sectors of society … it appears that the Land Law, in force for more than 30 years, is no longer able to respond effectively to the current development of MSAR" ('Explanatory Memorandum of the Draft Law'). The draft was approved in general terms by the Legislative Assembly of Macau on February 5 2013.
  • Bumkyu Sung and Ik Hwan Cho of Kim & Chang explain the impact and future of South Korea’s law separating banks and securities firms
  • Jeffrey Oakes and Connie Milonakis of Davis Polk & Wardwell outline the key features and disclosure considerations for European banks issuing into the US
  • Philippos Aristotelous In accordance with its commitment to its international lenders, Cyprus has made a number of changes to tax rates. With effect from January 1 2013 the corporate income tax rate has been increased from 10% to 12.5%. The rate of special defence contribution (SDC) on interest has also been increased, from 15% to 30%. The increase will take effect from the date of publication of the law in the official gazette, probably during May 2013. SDC tax is payable only by tax residents of Cyprus; non-resident individuals and companies are completely exempt, and interest on corporate financing or loan arrangements is subject to income tax rather than SDC tax.
  • Clive Cunningham, Pat Horton and Nish Dissanayake of Herbert Smith Freehills explore the impact of the AIFM Directive on marketing alternative investment funds
  • Michael M Wiseman and Elizabeth T Davy of Sullivan & Cromwell explore the increasingly hostile US enforcement climate for financial institutions
  • Sandro Núñez Stock options are a kind of option right granted to employees. They allow those employees, within a specified term, to acquire equity in the employing company at a price agreed on the date of the call option. Stock options are created with the purpose of securing an employee's long-term commitment to the company, either as a part of a compensation plan, as a standalone agreement with a key employee, or as part of an M&A transaction where the selling parties intend to stay as part of the company's management.
  • Daniel Futej Cyril Hric For the past several weeks, the European banking sector has been facing a relatively specific situation where the owners of accounts in certain banks in Cyprus had to forfeit their deposits in a manner usually seen when a bank goes bankrupt. On the other hand, one of the effective tools used by EU member states in combating tax fraud and evasion is a restriction on cash payments. This means that parties are forced to settle their monetary obligations by means of bank transfer. Slovakia also adopted a law late last year expressly prohibiting cash payments exceeding a specified amount – Act No 394/2012 on restrictions on cash payments, which came into force on January 1 2013. The Act considers cash payments to be the handing over of notes or coins, in cash, in the euro or other currency, and the acceptance of that cash by the recipient. The limit on cash payments made between natural persons who are not entrepreneurs is €15,000 ($19,600). If the parties are legal persons or natural person entrepreneurs, however, the limit on cash payments between such parties is €5,000. If a cash payment is split into several instalments, where all the instalments are associated with one and the same legal arrangement, the instalments will be taken as a whole for the determination of the value of the cash payment.
  • Mian Muhammad Nazir The judgment of the Dubai Court of First Instance, in a case involving an ijara contract (lease contract), contemplates the UAE courts' level of familiarity with complex Islamic finance contract instruments. Though the court decision may be subject to appeal, but as it stands, it reveals an evidence of adequate judicial recognition for Islamic finance contracts. Although it is not the first case that recognises the application of principles of Shariah and Islamic contracts and instruments, the decision will nevertheless confirm the UAE legal and judicial systems' readiness to dispense justice and adjudicate civil and commercial disputes strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the underlying contracts and the governing law of such contracts.