IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,936 results that match your search.25,936 results
  • The territory’s regulators are struggling to address increased risks of virtual currency trading
  • Ignacio Buil Aldana Marcos Perales Mellado The measures introduced by the 2014 reform of the Spanish Insolvency Act represent a step forward for debt-for-equity swaps. The reform aims to give operationally viable but financially constrained companies a flexible and attractive debt capitalisation regime, while also respecting the creditor's legitimate expectations.
  • The financial services industry is urging the country’s regulators to seriously reconsider the proposed net stable funding ratio rule
  • Final SEC guidance on cross-border SBSs is likely to ease concerns surrounding reporting duties and compliance with the SEC’s Regulation SBSR
  • Source of British pride: Bond or schemes?
  • Investors now need a complete risk profile Sustainability due diligence on IPOs is gaining ground on the traditional disclosure of financial, legal, tax and accounting information. The assessment of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and opportunities is now an integral part of the IPO process, according to PwC.
  • Britain's vote to leave the EU has far-reaching ramifications for European insolvency law, and could see proceedings opened under English law disregarded by other jurisdictions.
  • The BRRD’s lack of prescriptive approach could be a reason EU member states have differing views on recovery and resolution strategies for their banks
  • Buyers looking to finance acquisitions in government-run auctions are finding their commitment letters under increasing scrutiny
  • Urs Kägi Daniel Küpfer In public M&A deals, bidding and target companies often agree on payments in the event that the deal cannot close. Payments from the target to the bidder are known as (direct) break fees. Reverse break fees are payments from the bidder to the target. Both types of fee serve to protect the deal and to control parties' behaviour.