IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,336 results that match your search.25,336 results
  • The EC's equivalency decisions for Australia, Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore’s central CCP regulatory regimes is a positive move for the region
  • Gabriela Vásquez Through Law 131(Law) of December 2013, Panama amended the arbitral process for both domestic and international commercial arbitration. The newly enacted law replaces previous regulation on the matter, developing new guidelines that respond to the increasing popularity of arbitration as a fast method for the alternative resolution of conflicts. Law 131 sets out, among other things, new terms and deadlines for all parties involved in the arbitration process (plaintiff, defendant, arbitral tribunal, judicial tribunals, and the Fourth Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice), to act or proceed. As a prime example, the new law reduces the timeframe for the Arbitral Tribunal to issue the arbitral award which settles the dispute.
  • Regulatory burdens on Chinese outbound acquirers have been eased. It paves the way for a more balanced cross-border investment dynamic
  • Kyohei Mizukoshi The Financial Services Agency of Japan (JFSA) published the amendment to the Guidelines for the Disclosure of Corporate Affairs (Disclosure Guidelines) on August 27 2014. The Disclosure Guidelines do not constitute statutory laws of Japan, but provide matters to be considered in applying the laws and regulations concerning corporate disclosure, including the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan (FIEA). This amendment abolishes the waiting period for the securities registration for certain 'well-known companies' and clarifies which acts do not constitute a 'pre-filing offer'. Generally, where a listed company conducts a public offering, it must file a securities registration statement (SRS), then wait for seven days before it can issue its securities to investors. This waiting period is designed to give investors time to decide, based on the information disclosed, whether to acquire and purchase the securities. Under the amended Disclosure Guidelines, only in cases involving the filing of an SRS by certain well-known companies, the SRS becomes effective on the date of filing and such companies can issue their securities to investors from the filing date. This exemption is available to certain types of equity offerings by well-known companies whose shares are listed on a stock exchange in Japan and whose market capitalisation is ¥10 billion ($93 million) or above. Additionally, this exemption is available to a non-Japanese company which meets these requirements.
  • Rose Marie M King-Dominguez In a May 8 2014 opinion, the Philippines' Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) advised that the provision of 'an online platform intended to increase the sale of a particular product' is a mass media activity. Under the Constitution, ownership and operation of mass media enterprises is wholly reserved to Filipino citizens.
  • Who took home what from the 2014 awards ceremony
  • A failed challenge to the CFTC’s extraterritorial reach has caused disappointment. But Linklaters' Caird Forbes-Cockell, Noah Melnick and Edward Ivey explain why the regulator’s new chief could be the silver lining
  • A European Banking Authority monitoring report on additional tier 1 (AT1) instruments could result in less future-proof language in deals
  • Regulators have agreed that the Hong Kong – Shanghai Stock Connect will create unprecedented cooperation between the two markets' rulemakers
  • Market participants agree that the association's Resolution Stay Protocol is a positive development, but many are concerned about enforceability