IFLR is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 25,853 results that match your search.25,853 results
  • The Australian iron ore project marks an important step forward for limited recourse financing in mining projects. Here's why
  • The wide scope of the final US Volcker rule has cast doubt on banks’ ability to make use of the exemptions
  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom was named the Americas firm of the year at this year's IFLR Americas Awards. See the full list of winners here
  • The country's Basel III-compliant bond market has an established framework for AT1 offerings. But more innovation is expected in Tier 2s.
  • Foreign investors will lose an important protection mechanism if the country terminates all of its bilateral investment treaties
  • As the comment period for Reg AB II closes, issuers and investors continue to clash over the level of disclosures in ABS offerings
  • Spain has overhauled its bankruptcy regime in a bid to make it easier for ailing companies to avoid liquidation. But the long-anticipated reforms will likely need further amendments to ensure they are workable
  • Virtual currencies are set to play a key role in the evolution of finance. But developing links between the two worlds won't be easy
  • Mak Lin Kum The Companies Bill 2013, tabled by the Companies Commission of Malaysia, proposes a new approach to the reduction of share capital, in line with developments in jurisdictions like Australia and Singapore. At present, a special resolution for the reduction of share capital requires a confirmation by the court before it can take effect. The new bill allows an alternative and a seemingly simpler process of capital reduction, whereby only a special resolution and solvency statement are required. The option of going to court to confirm a capital reduction resolution is still preserved under this new Bill. Although it may appear that this non-court approach is simpler, several reasons may be offered as to why the court approach may continue to remain popular and not be rendered obsolete.
  • Enforcement places a significant strain on the finances of liable parties, and as such the legislation on enforcement should offer not only a legal basis for effective enforcement, but it should also ensure reasonable protection for the liable parties.