Search results for

The introduction of new substance requirements for global business companies operating from Mauritius, which will become effective on January 1 2015, are part and parcel of a strategy to further boost financial services and increase their input to the country's gross domestic product (GDP).

Pedro Cortés Marta Mourão Teixeira On January 14 2014, the Macau Monetary Authority reported that, according to the 2014 Report on the Index of Economic Freedom (the Index) drawn by the Heritage Foundation, the Macau Special Administrative Region (SAR) takes 29th place amongst the 178 ranked global economic systems, as well as seventh place out of 42 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, right after Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Chinese Taiwan and Japan. The score awarded to Macau's economic freedom is 71.3. Its overall score is quite higher than both world and regional averages.

Hogan Lovells’ Imtiaz Shah and Erin Kiem on why foreign investors are choosing joint ventures with local partners over traditional franchise arrangements

Andri Aidham Badri Putri Norlisa Mohd Najib Under the Labuan Financial Services and Securities Act 2010 and Labuan Islamic Financial Services and Securities Act 2010, the Labuan Financial Services Authority (LFSA) has recently issued its revised Guidelines on the Establishment of Labuan Mutual Funds, including Islamic Mutual Funds, which came into effect on January 1 2014 (the Guidelines). The issuance of the revised Guidelines emphasises the continued commitment by the LFSA to encourage the establishment of Labuan-based mutual funds.

In 2013, Mauritius proceeded with the inauguration of a modern state-of-the-art passenger terminal at Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport. The new terminal, which covers a total surface area of 57,000 m2, will enable the country to handle 4 million passengers annually (against 2.7 million presently), whilst helping to project Mauritius on the international scene and boost commercial exchanges and the tourism industry. The main idea is to provide the latest in terms of infrastructure in order to increase the number of foreigners entering Mauritius.

Banji Adenusi In December 2013, the Central Bank of Nigeria released the guidelines on the implementation of Basel II/III recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which implementation took effect from January 2014. While the timeframe for implementation of the minimum capital adequacy computation under Basel II rules will commence in June 2014, the banks have already begun a parallel run of the Basel II capital adequacy computation along with existing Basel I requirements. In specifying the approaches for quantifying the risk-weighted assets for the purpose of determining regulatory capital, the banks are required to adopt the standardised approach in relation to market and credit risks, with the basic indicator approach adopted for operational risk. Rather than adopt a sweeping endorsement of the Basel II/III accords however, the Central Bank (CBN) has modified the guidelines, taking into consideration the present realities of the Nigerian banking system. Credit risk modifications abound in the risk weight assigned to inter-bank transactions and exposures guaranteed by the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) or CBN, exposures to FGN or CBN transactions denominated in naira and funded in that currency, amongst others, which carry risk weight of 0%. Other modifications include exposures secured by residential mortgage loans, which carry a risk weight of 100%, compared to the recommended 35% in the Basel II accord. Unrated on-balance sheet securitisation carries a risk weight of 1250%, whereas the Basel II accord provides no risk weight for such transaction.

In late 2013, the Slovak Parliament approved an amendment to the income tax act (the Amendment). One of the objectives of the Amendment is to fight tax evasion. Some of the most interesting changes are: higher withholding rate/tax security; the right to tax Slovak tax non-residents on certain transactions; introduction of tax licences; and, tax rate for legal entities reduced to 22%. Higher withholding rate

After Hong Kong, which city has the most potential as an offshore RMB hub? Vote now

Soonghee Lee In May 2011, an employee at a defendant's branches introduced a discretionary investment agreement operated by a certain investment advisory company to individual investors (the plaintiffs). The investment product was mainly invested in KOSPI 200 options listed on the Korea Exchange using contract monies received by the investment advisory company from investors under discretionary investment agreements. In introducing the investment product, the employee presented and introduced a discretionary investment proposal prepared by the investment advisory company. Later, the employee visited the plaintiffs and prepared an application for the opening of an account, which proposed the plaintiffs' subscription to the investment product, with the defendant as the securities company for transactions. In August 2011, the KOSPI 200 stock price index declined sharply, and the plaintiffs incurred considerable losses. The plaintiffs then filed a suit for damages against the defendant, claiming the defendant had made an investment recommendation and thus had violated the suitability principle and its duty to explain, which should have been observed when the investment recommendation was made, under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (FISCMA). In the course of litigation, the defendant argued that no investment recommendation had been made, since the investment product was not sold by the defendant itself, and investment recommendations must be construed as limited in scope to cases where the relevant financial investment business recommends an agreement which it directly handles. The defendant's argument was that it had merely introduced the investment product and, for the plaintiffs' convenience, had assisted in the execution of the contracts. Therefore, the defendant had not made an investment recommendation subject to the suitability principle and the duty to explain. In support of such argument, the defendant stated it did not receive any sales commission or operating income, and did not directly handle the investment product. The court of first instance held that the defendant, as a financial investment business, was in the position of a person recommending the investment product to the plaintiffs. The court held that the employee first presented and explained the discretionary investment proposal to the plaintiffs while introducing the investment product; the plaintiffs only intended to invest after listening to such explanation, and their investment decision seems to have been based on the employee's explanation. As the employee even prepared a confirmation statement on the results of investment tendency screening and a discretionary investment agreement for each of the plaintiffs, in their name, the plaintiffs could reasonably believe that the defendant was performing the role of an intermediary for the discretionary investment agreements, and although the defendant did not obtain any sales commission or operating income, the defendant did earn a transaction fee.

Martin Irwin, Baker & McKenzie Howard Lam, Latham & Watkins SLAUGHTER AND MAY finally broke its lateral hire deadlock by recruiting directly into partnership for the first time in its 125-year history. This piece of history happened in Hong Kong through the hire of Morrison & Foerster's (MoFo) co-head of China capital markets John Moore. Last month saw a string of other hires in the city-state. LATHAM & WATKINS welcomed banking partner Howard Lam from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, while HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS brought in financial services regulatory expert William Hallatt from Linklaters. WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES recruited investment funds specialist Albert Cho from Kirkland & Ellis, and DLA PIPER hired restructuring and insolvency partner Mark Fairbairn from O'Melveny & Myers.