Search results for

Leonardo Fernández Rodríguez According to Law 9/2012 on restructuring of credit entities and Royal Decree 1559/2012 that develops Law 9/2012, the Spanish bad bank Sociedad de Gestión de Activos procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria (Sareb) is entitled to incorporate separate estates under the form of bank assets funds (fondos de activos bancarios, or FABs) to which it may assign either assets or assets and liabilities from its balance. FABs will operate as a mix of a securitisation fund and a collective investment vehicle. Assets eligible to be transferred to any FAB are not limited to those previously assigned to Sareb by credit entities subject to public aid according to applicable legislation, since the eligibility criteria also extends to money and deposits as well as fixed income notes listed in any official secondary market.

With debate continuing around the interpretation of standard provisions in sovereign debt, the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) plans to help better facilitate sovereign debt restructurings. ICMA’s general counsel, Leland Goss, explains how

Mian Muhammad Nazir The judgment of the Dubai Court of First Instance, in a case involving an ijara contract (lease contract), contemplates the UAE courts' level of familiarity with complex Islamic finance contract instruments. Though the court decision may be subject to appeal, but as it stands, it reveals an evidence of adequate judicial recognition for Islamic finance contracts. Although it is not the first case that recognises the application of principles of Shariah and Islamic contracts and instruments, the decision will nevertheless confirm the UAE legal and judicial systems' readiness to dispense justice and adjudicate civil and commercial disputes strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the underlying contracts and the governing law of such contracts.

Mark-Oliver Baumgarten, Thiemo Sturny, Andreas Bättig and Stefan Knobloch of Staiger Schwald & Partner examine the reasons why Switzerland has remained a financial hub while economic instability has claimed so many of its neighbours

Vandana Shroff of Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co examines the increasingly important role that the international bond markets are playing in capital raising for Indian companies

Veena Sivaramakrishnan Pooja Yedukumar Restructuring continues to be the buzz word in India in 2013. It is not just in the context of non-performing assets that banks and financial institutions are seeking to restructure their books. Be it corporate debt restructuring (CDR) or restructuring under the statutory realm of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), companies seem to be resorting to these methods as an easy means of rehabilitation. The CDR mechanism is technically voluntary, though most Indian banks (especially in the public sector) are members of the CDR Cell, thereby making it mandatory for them to participate in the restructuring of a company to which they have an exposure in India. The CDR process provides for banks and financial institutions (which are not a party to the Cell) to enforce their rights outside the CDR mechanism. Effectively this allows companies to get some leeway especially from CDR participating banks in relation to their obligations, while continuing to ensure that the rights of the non-participating banks are not adversely affected.

Beatriz del C Cabal Until recently, when clients inquired about the steps to complete a spin-off of a Panamanian corporation, the answer was that the Commercial Code and Corporate Law did not regulate the matter. Since it was unregulated, clients were very sceptical about moving forward with this process, more so because of the uncertainty of the tax and commercial implications that this operation could carry. Since Law 85 of November 22 2012 was published, that uncertainty has gone. This new law regulates corporate spin-offs, for all types of Panamanian corporate legal entities, by the division of all or part of their assets and their transfer to an existing corporation or to a new one created specifically for that purpose, as long as the companies have the same shareholders.

Jeffrey Oakes and Connie Milonakis of Davis Polk & Wardwell outline the key features and disclosure considerations for European banks issuing into the US

Daniel Futej Cyril Hric For the past several weeks, the European banking sector has been facing a relatively specific situation where the owners of accounts in certain banks in Cyprus had to forfeit their deposits in a manner usually seen when a bank goes bankrupt. On the other hand, one of the effective tools used by EU member states in combating tax fraud and evasion is a restriction on cash payments. This means that parties are forced to settle their monetary obligations by means of bank transfer. Slovakia also adopted a law late last year expressly prohibiting cash payments exceeding a specified amount – Act No 394/2012 on restrictions on cash payments, which came into force on January 1 2013. The Act considers cash payments to be the handing over of notes or coins, in cash, in the euro or other currency, and the acceptance of that cash by the recipient. The limit on cash payments made between natural persons who are not entrepreneurs is €15,000 ($19,600). If the parties are legal persons or natural person entrepreneurs, however, the limit on cash payments between such parties is €5,000. If a cash payment is split into several instalments, where all the instalments are associated with one and the same legal arrangement, the instalments will be taken as a whole for the determination of the value of the cash payment.

With interest rates still low, yield-hungry investors are flocking to global debt capital markets. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer’s Peter Allen, Mark Trapnell and Denise Ryan discuss the key market drivers and reveal the next high-yield product